The work
You are here because your situation deserves more than a conversation with someone who only understands the business side of it.
Here’s what working together actually looks like — what happens, in what order, and what you can expect along the way.
Every engagement begins with listening. Not a group meeting, not a facilitated session — individual, confidential conversations with each person involved. Up to five people, one to two sessions each, roughly 45 minutes each.
The purpose isn’t to gather complaints. It’s to develop an accurate picture of what’s actually driving the situation. Most of the time, the stated problem is what someone is experiencing directly, but the real problem is something that is going on below the surface that no one recognizes. The real problem is what needs to be brought to the surface.
From those conversations, a written assessment is prepared. It names what’s happening, explains what’s driving it, and identifies the specific dynamics that need to be addressed for anything to change. It does not assign blame. It does not name individual sources for individual statements. It is a map of the system, not a verdict on the people in it.
The assessment and a suggested plan are then delivered twice: first in a private session with the person who engaged this work, so there are no surprises; then in a joint session with everyone involved, so the conversation begins from a shared understanding rather than filtered through one person’s account of what was said.
Findings are delivered to everyone in the room together, deliberately. If the assessment identifies a pattern in which information gets filtered through a single person, delivering the findings only to that person would reproduce the exact dynamic the work is meant to address.
Once the assessment is delivered, the engagement rolls into regular advisory sessions. This is where the actual work happens — not in the diagnosis, but in the implementation of what the diagnosis revealed.
Sessions are calibrated to need, not to a fixed format. Some months that means working with the full group. Some months it means individual sessions with one or two people navigating something specific. The plan from Phase 1 guides the direction, but the real-time dynamics of what’s surfacing guide the week-to-week work.
The goal is always the same: to move the people involved toward a way of operating together that doesn’t require constant management, mediation, or avoidance. That means building the capacity to have hard conversations directly — not just resolving the immediate issue, but changing the pattern that produced it.
Most engagements reach a natural completion around the six-month mark. Some move faster. Some need more time. When the work is completed, as defined by both the advisor and the parties involved, the process is concluded. The goal is to create lasting change, not dependency on the advisor.
Some situations don’t need an ongoing engagement — they need a specific, stuck decision to move. A succession question that keeps getting deferred. A partnership dispute that has reached an impasse. A family meeting that everyone is dreading and no one has been willing to facilitate.
Formal mediation training is part of this practice, including years of experience running mediations for parties in significant conflict. That background makes it possible to facilitate the kind of session that most advisors avoid — where the parties disagree, the stakes are real, and the room needs someone who can hold the structure without losing the people.
Mediation engagements are scoped separately, depending on the number of sessions, participants, and the nature of the decision being addressed. They can stand alone or accompany an ongoing engagement.
What to expect
What does a session actually look like?
The two rounds of introductory sessions with everyone involved are conducted in person, if logistics allow. After that, sessions will either be in person or via secure video calls, as agreed on by the advisor and the participants. Between sessions, brief email or call availability during normal business hours is included for things that can’t wait.
Who needs to participate?
The assessment interviews include everyone directly involved in the dynamic being addressed — typically three to five people. The ongoing sessions are calibrated to what’s most needed each month. Participation is voluntary, but the quality of the work depends on the good faith effort of the people in it.
Is this confidential?
Individual interviews are confidential — what you share is not attributed to you by name in the written assessment. The findings are presented as patterns, not as a record of who said what. This is not a clinical relationship and is not protected by therapist-client privilege, but confidentiality is taken seriously and built into every part of the process.
How is this different from therapy?
This is business advisory work, not psychotherapy. Derrick A. Mason is a licensed marriage and family therapist, and that clinical training informs the depth and quality of this work — but the engagement itself is advisory, not clinical. No clinical diagnosis is made, no clinical treatment is provided, and no therapist-client relationship is created. The distinction is real and is stated explicitly in every client agreement.
Ready to talk
The right first step is a brief conversation — not a commitment. Reach out here to start getting help on the situation your business is navigating.
Get in touch